June 4, 2026
On June 4, CCC’s Policy Team submitted testimony to the New York City Council General Welfare Committee Preliminary Budget Oversight Hearing. On behalf of CCC, the testimony uplifts recommendations on how to improve the delivery of essential services for NYC families and children, including the reforming the city’s housing voucher application and shelter intake processes, increasing funding for a program that serve food pantries, and more.
Thank you, Chair Hudson and members of the City Council General Welfare Committee, for holding today’s important hearing on the Mayor’s FY27 Executive Budget. Below we uplift recommendations for how to improve the delivery of essential services for NYC families and children.
Address Family Homelessness
The current housing and shelter crisis calls for bold actions and enhanced funding to reduce housing instability for families with children. The most recent CCC’s Keeping Track of New York City’s Children data book revealed that in 2024, 29% of NYC renters pay at least half of their income towards rent, and nearly one in three renter households with children are living in overcrowded conditions. Additionally, there were more than 17,000 residential evictions in 2025, and nearly 34,000 children resided in the NYC shelter system.[1]
CCC is co-convener of the Family Homeless Coalition (FHC), a coalition comprised of 20 organizations representing service and housing providers, child advocacy organizations, and people with lived experience of housing instability and homelessness. We are united by the goal of preventing family homelessness, improving the well-being of children and families in shelter, and supporting the long-term stability of families with children who leave shelter. CCC supports FHC’s 2026 Policy Priorities. Below we uplift a number of the critical investments and policy changes necessary to prevent homelessness and support families struggling with housing instability.
Reform CityFHEPS Administration
The City Fighting Homelessness and Eviction Prevention Supplement (CityFHEPS) is a critical rental assistance program that reduces and prevents homelessness in New York City. Since 2018, it has helped tens of thousands of individuals and families find and maintain housing. As vital as this tool has been for New Yorkers, significant administrative burdens create persistent barriers including time-consuming application and approval processes. To address these barriers, CCC and FHC recommend the following reforms to the administration of CityFHEPS.
Recommendations:
Restore Homebase to the Core of What it Does Well
Since the pandemic, Homebase providers have been saddled with huge administrative and capacity burden without necessary adjustments in funding and staffing levels to match the current demands of New Yorkers facing housing instability and the expanded scope of services expected from the City. As a result, wait times have increased for critical Homebase services. A shift in scope is needed to enable Homebase staff to focus on outreach and offering holistic support. To ensure that Homebase can return to providing its core services effectively and efficiently, CCC and FHC recommend the following:
Recommendations:
Shelter Intake Reform
For families in need of family shelter, the intake process is overly burdensome and designed to produce overly high numbers of initial denials. Processes that are meant to confirm families’ need for shelter have too many barriers, are often uprooting, and needlessly lengthen families’ time spent in housing insecurity.
Recommendations:
Application Process Reform: The application process to prove homelessness takes 62 days on average. Methods of proving homelessness are difficult to achieve, and the reapplication process can be uprooting.
Placements Near Schooling: Nearly 40% of families in shelter continue to be placed in a different borough from where their youngest child goes to school disrupting children’s education.
Combat Food Insecurity
Families in New York City continue to confront a severe affordability crisis. 73% of children in New York City are economically insecure [2] as families struggle with skyrocketing costs, including food prices. More than 1.4 million New Yorkers are experiencing food insecurity, including one in four children.[3] Widespread and harmful cuts to SNAP –resulting from H.R.1 at the federal level –have disrupted one of the most important resources in the fight against food insecurity. As a result, more families are turning to food pantries and banks to help alleviate food insecurity.
It is imperative that New York City continues to invest and fund resources that are vital to the health and well-being of children and families, where 33% of SNAP-enrolled households have children.[4] We must meet current needs and prepare for the increased demand for emergency food that will occur due to federal actions that weaken SNAP, freeze funding for pantries and farmers, and potentially raise food prices.
We applaud the inclusion of $53.6 million baseline funding for Community Food Connection (CFC) in the FY27 Preliminary Budget, as well as the inclusion of $10 million for Groceries to Go in the FY27 Executive Budget. Food pantries are the last line of defense against hunger for so many, yet these essential services are being asked to do more with less. While this funding constitutes a substantial investment in CFC, more is needed to provide critical support for communities facing worsening affordability and food insecurity crises.
As a member of the NYC Food Policy Alliance, a network of 60+ food system stakeholders that advocate for public policies and funding that ensure equitable access to a healthy, sustainable food system, CCC recommends the following investments be included in the FY27 Adopted Budget:
CCC also supports the continuation of funding for the following City Council Initiatives:
Preserving and Protecting Access to Public Benefits
NYC Benefits provides critical services to thousands of New Yorkers in accessing and maintaining public benefits. Staff at over 30 community-based organizations, contracted through the Department of Social Services (DSS) help their clients with enrollment and renewal of benefits, such as SNAP, Medicaid and Cash Assistance, that provide a lifeline for families. As such, we were deeply concerned that funding for NYC Benefits was not included in the FY27 Executive Budget. In the wake of federal changes to social safety net programs and the affordability crisis, NYC Benefits is integral to ensuring child and family well-being in New York City.
CCC, along with advocates across the city, calls on the Administration and City Council to:
Restore Alternatives to Incarceration (ATI) and Supportive Programming for Youth and Young Adults
Extensive research demonstrates the positive impacts of Alternatives to Incarceration (ATI) and reentry programs, including lowering recidivism and crime.[5] Moreover, studies estimate between $3.46-$5.54 in returns for every dollar invested in ATI programs in addition to reduced costs for the criminal justice system and better community health outcomes.[6]
Despite the well-established benefits of these programs, since 2023, the City Administration has cut millions from probation programs proven to support re-entry by connecting young people to mentorship and services. Failing to provide robust reentry services or supportive probation programs will harm youth and is counterproductive to building safe communities.
CCC supports the recommendations of the New York City Youth Justice Coalition, including the following investments and restorations in the FY27 Budget:
Invest in Child Welfare Primary Prevention and Workforce Stability
Fundamental to preventing child welfare involvement is investing in the primary prevention supports families need to be safe and secure, including housing, child care, healthy food, and economic supports.
At the same time, the prevention workforce currently in place to support families is in crisis. In 2025, CCC and the Council of Family and Child Caring Agencies (COFCCA) surveyed prevention services providers to better understand the challenges facing families involved in the child welfare system and providers’ ability to serve them. Our results echoed the need for upstream prevention and workforce stabilization.
To help ensure that prevention services can best serve children and families, we recommend the following: